Presentation
Screen Mounts
Screen Mounts
Screen Mount Suspension History
The Laboratory of Advanced Engineering at the University of Pretoria was given the task to develop a cost effective screen mount for the mining industry.
The concept or system, that met most of the requirements was the Neidhart Concept. In April 1992 a series of Neidhart Screen Mounts was developed and tested on screens in the laboratory and in the production environment.


Suspension Study
A comparison of a Neidhart Suspension and a Coil spring suspension was compiled by Gideon van Eeden for Investmech (Pty) Ltd in February 2001.
Here are some of the findings…
An ultimate strength (Sut) of 400 Mpa
S’f = 0.65 x Sut = 260 Mpa
Yield strength (Sy) of 300 Mpa
Fatigue limit (S’e) of 160 Mpa
Both the Screen Mount and the coil spring induced stresses are far below the fatigue limit and are therefore harmless to the supporting structure if the structure doesn't resonate.
G. v Eeden, Comparison of a Neidhart Suspension and a Coil Spring Suspension, 2001
An exercise was done where a theoretical SN curve was used to model the damage during start-up and stoppage. The results are compared in the table below.
G. v Eeden, Comparison of a Neidhart Suspension and a Coil Spring Suspension, 2001 says: “As is clearly shown, the coil spring caused significant more damage during stoppage than the Neidhart system. Although the Neidhart system showed more damage during start-up”, the total damage for a start-up and stoppage was more severe using coil spring suspension.
Advantages
• Fewer units required
• Lower dynamic stiffness in vertical plane
• Drastically lower dynamical stiffness in horizontal plane
• Terrific vibration isolation,Excellent operation,Noiseless operation.
• Most economical screen suspension over lifetime
• No down-time or lost production due to suspension failure
• No breakages due to mechanical failure
• Operates effectively, even under extreme conditions
• Reliable under overloaded conditions
• Resistant to dust, water, corrosion
• Allows for predictive maintenance
2 Plants each having :
14 Ripple Flow screen 8 x 20’ 10 tons
14 Low Flow screen 8 x 20’ 12 tons
The first plant change over to Neidhart Screen Mounts during 1989.
Average lifetime of Screen mounts were ± 5 years
Sasol Synthetic Fuels experienced the following :
No forced stoppages or replacements during the lifetime of the screen mounts
No labour cost and no down time
100 % Availability for continuous operations as far as screen mounts is concerned


Download this document for the full details on Screen Mounts, Click here!
Please note: You have to be loged in to download this document.
OST-News
OST USA's document section is now open, click here to view or download the documents.
Published Articles on OST-africa, click on the article bellow to download or log into our document section.
• Power Saving.pdf
Download newest pdf reader here.
|
Newest/Most Popular Blog Entries |
|
|

